Maverick spending refers to unauthorized or off-contract spending within an organization, often leading to negative consequences like loss of savings and supplier relationship strain. 

The Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS) warns of significant long-term effects, with potential impacts on cash flow, operational risks, and even reputational harm. Tackling such spending requires diligent oversight of spend categories and a commitment to reinforcing procurement guidelines.

It's a common challenge many companies face, but with the right strategies, it can be effectively managed and prevented.

Key areas affected by maverick spending:

• Contractual Agreements: Missed discounts and volume rebates
• Supplier Management: Weakened supplier relationships and potential disputes
• Cost Control: Increased prices from non-preferred suppliers and operational inefficiencies

Let's explore the causes and effects of maverick spending, as well as practical strategies and best practices to prevent it and ensure financial efficiency and operational stability within your organization.

What are the two main causes of maverick spending?

Maverick spending often starts with a foundational issue—a lack of well-defined procurement policies. Without clear guidelines, employees may be unaware of, or confused by, the proper procedures for making purchases.

Procurement policies are not just formalities; they are blueprints for making transparent, efficient, and cost-effective purchases that align with regulatory requirements.

When such policies are poorly communicated, undefined, or entirely absent, the door is left open for employees to make unauthorized transactions.

These lapses can lead to:

• Operational disruptions
• Contract breaches
• Loss of negotiated savings
• Negative impacts on supplier relationships

1. Lack of oversight in the procurement process

A lack of oversight is another culprit in the rise of maverick spend. Proper supervising within the procurement process is crucial to ensure efficiency, accuracy, and adherence to policies.

A pervasive sense of a lack of accountability can tempt employees to bypass the proper channels in search of easier or quicker purchasing methods. This can result in off-contract and unapproved spending, introducing a raft of issues, from inflated costs to damaged supplier partnerships.

The consequences of this oversight deficiency are multifold:

• Costly operational interruptions
• Challenges in financial stability
• Compromised supply chain integrity
• Difficulty in tracking and analyzing spending patterns

The establishment of sound oversight mechanisms is key to deterring maverick spend and reinforcing the importance of adhering to procurement rules.

2. Unapproved supplier relationships

Maverick spend also arises from unapproved supplier relationships. These occur when employees independently engage with vendors outside the sanctioned supplier list, often bypassing the vetting and approval processes established by the procurement team. Such relationships carry multiple risks since these suppliers may not adhere to organizational standards of quality, delivery, and compliance.

The key risks include:

• Operational risks due to unmet standards
• Financial risks from the loss of volume discounts and rebates
• Reputational harm due to supplier non-compliance

To mitigate these risks, it is essential for organizations to educate their workforce on the importance of working with approved suppliers and to implement robust systems to prevent and detect maverick spending. 

These systems could involve the use of procurement software that sets parameters for supplier selection and purchase approval, thus reducing the likelihood of unapproved supplier relationships.

How to identify maverick spending

Identifying Maverick Spending entails a detailed and methodical approach to unveil transactions that bypass stipulated procurement policies, often resulting in the loss of potential cost savings.

This scrutiny requires a keen assessment of spend data, differentiating between preferred and non-preferred supplier transactions. To this end, the process involves several steps, including spend analysis, categorization by department, vendor, and spend category, and a close examination of spend control over specific areas such as marketing and professional services.

By comprehensively analyzing these factors, organizations can ferret out instances of maverick spend and address the underlying issues contributing to this costly bypass of preferred supplier arrangements.

You might be interested in: How to protect your runway during an economic downturn

1. Analyze spending patterns

The analysis of spending patterns demands the consolidation of various data sources—invoices, payment methods, ERP systems, and any financial records—into a unified database.

The complex data then undergoes a cleansing process where duplicates are removed, inconsistencies are resolved, and errors are rectified, shaping a dataset ripe for meticulous analysis.

With clean data at the helm, organizations can navigate through the maze of transactions and pinpoint discrepancies between purchases from preferred and non-preferred suppliers.

This activity is not trivial; with an accurate assessment, it is possible to calculate the volume and impact of rogue spending.

For example, consider an organization with an annual professional services expenditure of $1 million. If $100,000 reflects off-contract spending, the financial ramifications become clear—a substantive hemorrhage of negotiated savings.

Over a retrospective period, this methodical analysis provides valuable insights into the historical trend of Maverick Spend and its dent on the organization's savings over time.

2. Identify non-preferred suppliers

Putting maverick spending to a stop largely depends on the identification of purchases made from non-preferred suppliers. A blend of spend analytics tools and procurement systems becomes the lynchpin for tracking transactions that fall outside the guardrails of established procurement processes.

Through vigilant monitoring and proactive data analysis, organizations can catch these transactions in the act, circling back to reinforce the principles of procurement policy compliance and the utilization of sanctioned suppliers.

The apt use of these technological solutions enables companies to flag unorthodox supplier engagements, bolster contract compliance, and drive a structured preference towards cost-effective and preferred supplier relationships.

This proactive stance not only contains costs but also mitigates operational risks, preserving the procurement function's integrity.

3. Review contract spending

The dissection of contract spending is another formidable tactic in the fight against Maverick Spend. This involves a granular analysis of the spend data to reconcile recorded transactions against contractual obligations. It is a forensic approach, deconstructing the outflow of financial resources to pinpoint non-adherence to preferred supplier agreements.

The evaluation extends beyond the superficial layers, exposing immediate financial leaks and assessing the prolonged cost implications of such spending behavior. Contract spending reviews provide an analytical comparison, revealing the divergence between actual expenditures and the hypothetical—what could have been had procurement guidelines been dutifully observed.

Armed with this information, procurement professionals can re-strategize, realigning spending practices with the procurement function's foundations and securing the economic fortitude of preferred supplier contracts for future procurements.

Get your entire team on the same page with Sastrify's free internal procurement policy. You can copy it straight into your Notion dashboard. Instant download below.

{{form-component}}

What are the effects of maverick spending?

Maverick spending, often a rogue element within procurement processes, can quietly erode an organization's foundational efficiencies and savings. 

It's not just about uncontrolled expenditure but also about the accompanying risks that can ripple across departments and affect the entire business landscape. 

The effects of maverick spending, below outlined, manifest in various forms, each disruptive in its unique way.

1. Risk of operational disruption

Operational efficiency is the heartbeat of any organization, and maverick spending can act as a blockage in its arteries. The introduction of non-standard products and services—prompted by purchases not in line with existing systems and workflows—can lead to immediate disruptions. 

These interruptions stem from inconsistent supply chains, delayed deliveries, and potential quality issues with materials or services obtained from non-preferred sources.

Delays and operational snarls, from this form of rogue spending, ensue as employees scramble to integrate these non-standard acquisitions into the established processes, grappling with incompatibilities and seeking workarounds. 

The organizational gears that should move in synchrony start to creak and clank, resulting in productivity reductions and potential project derailments.

List of potential operational disruptions caused by maverick spending:

• Inconsistent supply chains and delayed deliveries
• Productivity losses due to incompatible products/services
• Contractual breaches and compliance issues
• Dissatisfied stakeholders due to subpar performance

2. Loss of negotiated savings

Maverick spending is synonymous with the forfeiture of hard-won cost savings that procurement teams strive to secure through strategic negotiations. The bypassing of established contracts and preferred suppliers leads to missed discounts and pre-negotiated rates—a direct financial blow to the organization.

Consolidated purchasing power, a key lever for cost savings, is diluted across various spend categories, undermining the efficacy of pre-arranged cost reduction strategies.

The bottom line is impacted substantially as unauthorized, non-compliant purchases diminish profitability and erode competitive advantages the organization might have held. This erosion of savings necessitates a redoubling of focus on compliance, procurement policies, and oversight to maintain the financial health and cost-efficiency objectives of the organization.

3. Impact on supplier relationships

Supplier relationships, nourished by reliability and trust, can be jeopardized by maverick spending. Unsanctioned purchasing sidesteps established contracts, disrupting the suppliers' expectation of volume and consistency. 

This breach of purchasing protocol can lead suppliers to retreat from offering the best pricing or value-added services, diminishing the potential for future cost-saving opportunities.

Moreover, maverick spending hampers the cultivation of strategic partnerships with suppliers, crucial for long-term benefits like collaborative improvement efforts and innovation. Repeat offenses can result in a loss of supplier commitment and trust, a critical cost that may exceed the immediate financial waste that maverick spending entails.

Considerations for supplier relationship management:

• Trust preservation by adhering to contracts
• Maintaining consistent purchasing patterns
• Engaging suppliers in continuous improvement initiatives
• Avoiding supplier dissatisfaction to promote competitive pricing

In conclusion, maverick spending invites a host of negative effects, from operational hiccups to depletion of savings and strained supplier relations. Identifying and steering clear of such spending is pivotal in preserving a streamlined procurement process that supports the larger business vision.

Strategies to prevent maverick spending

Maverick spending is an issue that plagues many organizations, leading to inefficiencies and loss of savings. 

Fortunately, there are proven strategies that can help curb this unauthorized expenditure and ensure that procurement processes align with a company's financial and operational goals.

1. Implementing strong procurement policies

Clear and robust procurement policies lay the foundation for cost savings and operational efficiency. By establishing guidelines that dictate the approved suppliers, purchase limits, and processes for requisition, organizations can create a comprehensive framework that preserves procurement protocols. 

These policies, when effectively communicated and enforced, empower employees with knowledge and foster a culture of compliance.

By ensuring all purchases are consolidated and channeled through preferred supplier relationships, procurement teams can tap into negotiated cost savings and keep maverick spend in check. 

2. Educating and training procurement professionals

Education and training are pivotal in reinforcing the importance of adhering to procurement policies. When procurement professionals grasp the full spectrum of benefits—from cost optimization to quality management—they are more likely to comply with established procedures. 

Realizing that procurement policies extend beyond the procurement department to benefit the entire organization can significantly incentivize compliance.

Comprehensive training sessions ensure that all procurement team members are knowledgeable about the procedures, their role in cost savings, and the risks of maverick spend. This, in turn, strengthens the supply chain and makes transparent, fair, and cost-effective procurement practices a standard within the organization.

3. Utilizing preferred suppliers

Preferred supplier programs are integral to managing and directing spend. By funneling purchases through an e-catalog system with pre-approved vendors, organizations can enforce compliance with procurement policies, ensuring that negotiated pricing and terms are upheld. 

Such systems are valuable as they drive users to make purchases that align with the procurement team's due diligence, thereby eliminating rogue spending.

Strategic supplier relationships cultivated through these programs further enhance cost-saving opportunities and support continuous improvement initiatives. 

This strategy focuses on spending patterns and consolidates purchasing power, ultimately reducing maverick spending and securing the best terms and conditions for the organization.

4. Effective Software subscription management

Software subscription management is a sophisticated approach to overseeing and optimizing technology spend. With the centralized management of all software license agreements and subscriptions, businesses gain visibility into crucial data points like renewal dates, license conditions, and usage statistics. 

This transparent management aids in recognizing unnecessary expenses, ensuring compliance with agreements, and rationalizing software spending.

Automatic renewal tracking and notification mechanisms provided by management tools help prevent the oversight of unused or underutilized software, delivering cost savings and averting operational risks. 

This level of management is crucial in today's digital landscape, where software-related expenses can rapidly escalate and contribute to maverick spend if not meticulously controlled.

In summary, these strategies—when executed effectively—form a strong defense against maverick spending, preserving the integrity of procurement functions and delivering value to the organization.

Need help managing your maverick spending?

Maverick spending can dent an organization's profitability. By remaining vigilant and actively implementing the right strategies to control your software spend, organizations can maintain efficient growth. 

Connect your SSO to Sastrify today to get full visibility into company-wide subscriptions. Watch a live demo to see how it all works.